A Symphony Orchestra is a collective holon. That it is an individual entity is implicit in the fact that we refer to it as a and give it a name, symphony orchestra. But it is also a collective organization of many individual holons. But I think that we can give status to things as either a collective holon, or simply a collection of holons. And there is a difference.(This idea is born out of years involved in the performing arts.) A bunch of musicians just sitting around is merely a collection of holons. A bunch of muscicians even all playing individual notes and phrases of music is just a collection of holons. Given a unified action –or unified life-a collective holon emerges. And it emerges when it unifies with Upper Quadrants.
Enter Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony. Basically the score is an individual UR entity, born of an UL entity (who is actually now dead), but contains an organization of LR techniques, directions, cues –all that is needed to bring the symphony to life. Beethoven needs a collective holon for the realization of his music. Otherwise it just stays in his UL and dies with him, otherwise it is nothing more than a musical score with a bunch of meaningless symbols.
But handed to the symphony orchestra it will never be realized without an individual UL. It will be a collection of holons, either not acting at all or acting not as a single unified entity. Beethoven’s symphony was created –all these collections of notes (holons) as a single thing. So we can not hear Beethoven unless the collection of acting holons (the musicians) gets an UL –the symphony orchestra has the task of realizing Beethoven’s individual dominant monad, the self-correcting, unifying individual interior.
So we need and have a stand in, the conductor, who’s job is to individually interpret Beethoven’s UL and then direct (conduct) this collection of holons to realize it as well.
Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony is a collective holon and only emerges when the orchestra, a collection of holons, gains an UL. Incidentally, it is usually the case that when performance time comes, the musicians of the orchestra spend very little time looking at the conductor. They only look at moments when it is in some way necessary (various musical moments that can vary from performance to performance, especially like beginnings and ends). Because, Maestro Y, interpreting and standing in as UL for Beethoven has brought a unified UL to the collection of holons, who all now have that UL as part of their “being”- or certainly the Being of the symphony. In best case scenarios, it is true that Beethoven’s symphony emerges with a certain life of its own. I think it is the job and aim of the collective (or collection) to realize the symphony’s dominant monad. Allow it to live through their unified, collective effort.
The same scenario, and actually even much more complex, holds for a dramatic play. It is a collective art form but is only realized when the collection collected to realize it gains a self-correcting UL, explicit in the UL of each individual actor, through individual UL of the director, from individual UR play script to the UL of the playwright. What is incredible, however, is that often eve the playwright (or composer) will tell you that there’s more going on in the individual life of that play then they could ever have realized or take credit for. Lastly, once Beethoven’s Fifth or Tennessee Williams Glass Menagerie has been given to an audience, the collective nature of individual holon exists inside more and more individual UL’s. It very interesting, really.
But my main point, is to suggest that collective holons only exist if they are somehow unified and self-corrected by some kind of an individual UL. It exists and works inside all of the individual holons, but the existence is marked by some single self-correcting, identifying life in the UL.
Even a relationship between two people, requires something “the same” in our individual UL’s and so I propose this is the UL of the relationship, as a single entity.
Without an individual UL it is not a collective holon, but a collection of holons. (To use my prefered jargon - collective, rather than social, for description purposes.)
And so I think the Lower Quadrants are made up of both collections and numerous, multiple, collectives - and a collective holon is marked by the presence of an individual UL of some kind.
And incidentally, I believe that the miracle of a collective UL is the Miracle of "We."
Thoughts? Feedback? Pulverizing criticisms?
Peace, Tim
"With whom or with what are you in communion at this moment?"
. . ."I?" he replied, almost mechanically. "Why not with anyone or anything."
"You must be a marvel . . . if you are able to continue in that state for long."
-Constantin Stanislavsky