Applying the Integral Method to Organizational
Change Initiatives
The Integral approach is sometimes called AQAL
(pronounced ah-qwal), short for "all quadrants,
all levels, all lines, all states, all types."
It is also called an Integral Operating System
(IOS), using a computer analogy, because once
IOS is installed, you can run any applications
software on it that you want (i.e., applications
to organizational issues; leadership development;
political, health, and environmental problems;
personal psychological and spiritual transformation,
and so on.)
The IOS simply checks to make sure that you are
including all of the major dimensions of human
existence in order to insure that whatever program
you are running is as comprehensive, effective,
and productive as it can possibly be—not because
this is an "outside" philosophy, but
because it is one that engages the potentials
already present in each and every human
being in the most positive fashion.
IOS can therefore serve as an invaluable tool
to practitioners in their assessment and creation
of a change initiative in virtually any area.
The Integral Approach does not herald the development
of yet another set of models and techniques that
claim to solve all business problems. Instead,
the Integral Approach contextualizes and shows
the interrelationships between existing and
future assessment and change management tools,
helping practitioners call on those best for the
situation at hand, leading to more effective,
balanced, and sustainable change interventions.
The Integral Approach to leadership in any area
implies that there is no "one right way"
of approaching change, but that all tools need
to be carefully brought to bear on crucial issues.
It is the change practitioner, in particular,
that is the vital link translating theory into
effective action.
One of the most important roles the change practitioner
plays is working in concert with the client to
intelligently assess (from an integral perspective)
the nature of the problems the client is facing,
the current capacities of the organization in
question, and the willingness of the client to
engage in the work necessary to address the gap
that may exist between the two.
Both the assessment and the suggested remedies
can be most effectively conducted using the Integral
Approach, which does not guarantee the outcome,
but does guarantee that all capacities are being
brought to bear on the issue in as comprehensive
a fashion as possible. If there is a solution,
the Integral Approach is therefore, by a wide
margin, the one most likely to be its midwife.
Pioneering Applications of the Integral Approach
The specific applications of an Integral approach
are many. Because the model was developed by a
cross-cultural examination of the available capacities
of human beings, an Integral Approach can be used
to help facilitate virtually any human endeavor.
Our approach continues to be, in all ways, grounded
in actual research, evidence, and data wherever
possible. Therefore, one of the primary goals
of I-I is to continue to support extensive research
into specific problem areas and issues, in an
attempt to learn more effectively how integral
approaches can further help resolve many of the
world's recalcitrant problems. This research is,
and will continue to be, made available to any
who wish to take advantage of it.
Specific research projects include:
Personal psychological and spiritual transformation
Global ecology
Integral business and organizational practices
Integral medicine
World hunger/famine
Education (in first, second, and third-world settings)
International politics
Integral city and community planning
Integral conflict resolution
Organizational development in general (IOS apps)
Personal transformation and Integral Transformative
Practice
The details of these projects are now being developed
by core teams in each of these areas. For
this general overview, perhaps we could give a
very brief outline of what these integral projects
have in common: namely, each of them takes a particular
problem area (e.g., ecology, education, medicine,
international politics, personal transformation)
and focuses on issues such as: What aspects
of this problem have been ignored by traditional
approaches? How can an integral analysis shed
light on these neglected areas? By taking
a more comprehensive and balanced approach, can
we gather evidence and data showing (1) that
and (2) how a more integral approach actually
helps resolve these heretofore stubborn problems?
In ecology, for example, we have presented
(at an Esalen conference on Integral Capitalism)
a more integral analysis of how ecological problems
can be approached using "all quadrants, all
levels, all lines." Most ecological "solutions"
focus merely on the exterior or "it"
dimensions of the problem: we must limit carbon
dioxide emissions, we must ban fluorocarbons,
we must recycle wastes, we should use hypercars,
and so on.
We do not deny the importance of such measures
(which address the Lower-Right quadrant). But
the Integral Approach goes one step further and
asks: have we also looked at any changes that
might be necessary in the interior dimensions
(of the "I" and "we")? For
example, using Kegan's model, the first thing
we note is that "ecological awareness"—or
an actual concern for global ecological issues—does
not fully emerge until 5th order consciousness.
In other words, unless a substantial number of
world leaders themselves possess an integral framework,
ecological issues will not receive the balanced
attention they deserve.
The same goes for political, business, military,
economic, and diplomatic issues and problems.
In order to adequately assess global, widespread,
and systematic problems, a leader must be able
to think globally—to think in comprehensive, integral
ways. The Integral approach helps with just that
task, by offering a global map for a global
world.
In international politics, for example, the exterior
dimensions (the "it" and "its"
quadrants) are being driven by economic factors,
often focusing on global capitalism as it encounters
local cultural realities (summarized in the popular
book by Thomas Friedman, The Lexus and the Olive
Tree).
But that economic analysis focuses merely on
the exterior dimensions. Samuel Huntington, in
his influential The Clash of Civilizations, points
out that much of the world's political dynamics
is driven by the differences in cultural values,
which he sees centered on nine major civilization
blocks.
But Huntington analyzes those civilization blocks
merely from a horizontal geopolitical location.
A more integral approach would point out that
many of those blocks are actually at different
orders of consciousness (as researched by, e.g.,
Kegan).
Which of them is right? All of them—or so the Integral Approach would maintain. But
to date, all of the major approaches to world
economic and political dynamics have severely
limited themselves by merely focusing on just
a few quadrants, or just a few levels, or only
a few lines, or perhaps some important types.
But none of them have offered a framework that
allows us to see how all of them have an important
influence on the nature and function of international
politics, business, military, and economic realities.
Clearly they are all playing a hand in the final
shape of the international situation, and the
Integral Approach shows explicitly how they all
fit together.
But beyond that, our specific research projects
focus (in this case) on very particular areas—such
as Iraq, Palestine, the Balkans, as well as inner-city
America—in an attempt to determine the precise
weight that each of the five major aspects of
human existence contributes to these various problems
(through both theoretical and practical analysis
and assessment). And therefore what the most effective
tactical and strategic interventions might be
to help move the process forward toward some sort
of resolution.
Likewise, in each of the other example areas,
Integral Institute attempts to both advance our
theoretical understanding of integral approaches,
as well as design particular research and application
cases. We design careful experimental research
that can help not only prove, but disprove, any
of our theoretical suggestions. If we are wrong
in a particular area, we want to be the first
to find out.
Experts in each of these areas—global business,
international politics, ecology, medicine, conflict
resolution, etc.—have been organized in order
to plan and carry forward these specific research
agendas. This is one of the primary goals of Integral
Institute: research actual instances of an integral
approach in action.
Needless to say, these are not merely theoretical
issues, but ones that directly impact the future
of humanity itself. One last, quick example: world
hunger and famine. Most approaches to world hunger
focus on the exterior dimensions in an attempt
to find ways to produce more food and distribute
it to more people. Again, we do not deny the importance
of those measures (which address the Lower-Right
quadrant).
But a more integral approach would also point
out the following. As Nobel-Prize winning economist
Amartya Sen demonstrated, famine has historically
occurred only in non-democratic societies. Even
in today's world, all famine occurs in non-democratic
areas (one of the reasons for this, according
to Sen, has to do with the necessity of unfettered
information flow in order to effectively distribute
food).
But, as research such as Kegan's has consistently
demonstrated, democracy and democratic values
emerge only with 4th order consciousness. It follows
that a significant number of individuals must
have access to 4th order consciousness in order
to avert famine. That is, famine is not due primarily
to a lack of food, but to a lack of consciousness
development.
An Integral Approach takes all of those factors
into account, especially when researching—and
then designing solutions for—recalcitrant problems
such as world hunger, political turmoil, cultural
clashes, educational and medical deficiencies.
The Integral approach does not advocate one particular
value system over another, but simply helps leaders
assemble the most comprehensive overview available,
so that they can more adequately and sanely address
the pressing issues now facing all of us.
Likewise with issues ranging from ecological
sustainability to education for a global tomorrow,
from personal transformation to integral spirituality,
from integral law to integral transformative practice:
by becoming an integrally informed individual
in any of those areas, one can leave the world
just a little bit more whole than one found it.
|